1992.07.15- Briefing Paper on Legal Aid Staff Attorney Salaries (ALAA) — OCR
Officers/Delegates: Please Copy & Distribute Immediately to All Members of ALAA & 1199
The Association of Legal Aid Attorneys
District 65 • UA W • AFL-CIO
13 Astor Place, New York, NY 10003-6980 • (212} 674-4188 • FAX: (212} 475-6091
Briefmg Paper on Legal Aid Staff Attorney Salaries
July 15, 1992
“There has probably never been a moment … of greater anxiety and pain over equal
justice in America.” New York 7imes editorial, May 9, 1992.
Events such as the beating of Rodney King and the determination of the Judicial
Commission on Minorities that the New York courts are “infested with racism” have strongly
reinforced the suspicion that the American judicial system is far from evenhanded, particularly
in its treatment of poor people and people of color.
In over 300,000 cases each year, nearly 1,000 members of the Association of Legal Aid
Attorneys work to ensure that equal justice is not merely an empty phrase for indigent New
Yorkers: children, homeless people, tenants, senior citizens, those charged with crimes, and
prisoners.
But in attempting to do so we face numerous obstacles, among them draconian
sentencing statutes, heavy workloads, poor physical working conditions, exposure to
tuberculosis and other diseases, an insufficient representation among legal staff of people of
color, poor treatment of support staff, and a host of other problems. Nothing, however,
presents a more serious threat to quality representation than low Legal Aid attorney salaries,
which for the past two years have been frozen and which, for most staff, are far behind those
at other major public-interest legal agencies.
Comparison of Non-Supervisory Atty. Salaries
Agency Starting Salary Maximum Salary
LAS $29,000 $60,900
LAS Fed. Def. $32,900 $86,100
Man. D.A. $32,000 $91,500
Brooklyn D.A. $30,000 $90,000
BronxD.A. $33,000 $89,000
Corp. Counsel $37,260 $62,100
NYS Atty. Gen. $30,990 $81,599
NYC HRA $39,804 $65,504
L.A. Pub. Def. $41,232 $94,008
A detailed examination of salaries for Legal Aid attorneys and Manhattan assistant
district attorneys (the point of comparison suggested by management in February) makes
Briefing Paper on Legal Aid Staff Attorney Salaries
Page2
particularly clear the fact that Legal Aid attorneys are discouraged from making their career
at the Society.1
This disparity is more than unfair; it seriously blunts the Society’s ability to
competitively hire new lawyers, to retain a solid core of seasoned senior attorneys, and to
maintain staff Society morale. As a recent national study of indigent defender organizations
concluded, ” [ t ]he success of indigent defenders is attributable … to the presence of experienced
co.unsel. .. “and to “a close approximation of parity between public defenders and prosecutors
in the areas of compensation … “2 Even the business-oriented Citizens Budget Commission
has concluded that for “positions such as … attorneys … substantial wage increases may be
necessary to attract and retain an adequate supply of qualified workers.”3
In principle, management and the City (which provides the majority of Legal Aid
funds), admit the need for comparable salaries, particularly with assistant district attorneys.
According to the Society’s president, “salaries of Legal Aid lawyers should remain comparable
to those of prosecuting attorneys – otherwise an unacceptable burden has been placed on one
1 See comparison of Staff Attorney salaries with those of non-supervisory Manhattan assistant district
attorneys, at Appendix A.
2 Indigent Defenders, Get the Job Done and Done Wel/3 (Nationai Center for State Courts, May 1992).
3 Toward A Responsible Municipal Wage Policy: Guidelines For The 1990 Round of Bargaining 30 (Citizens
Budget Commission, July 1990).
Briefing Paper on Legal Aid Staff Attorney Salaries
Page3 ‘
side of the scales of equal justice.”4 Similar sentiments have been expressed in recent years
by officials of the Criminal Defense Division, the Society’s public defender unit.5
In reality, however, Society management has done everything possible to avoid creating
salary comparability.
During 1991-1992 wage negotiations, the Society tacitly accepted the Association’s data
that demonstrated the gap with the Manhattan DA’s office, but rejected any increase with
the argument that the comparability principle does not apply after the fifth year6 –
conveniently the point at which the salary chasm widens dramatically – and rejected
additional annual salary steps to retain senior staff.
Management also argued that City money earmarked for wages in the 1990 contract,
but applied toward health benefits which management would otherwise have cut, must now
be included in a salary comparison even though the contract language (drafted by
management) specifically defined comparability as a comparison of the “salary schedule.”7
4 Address of Michael Iovenko to the Legal Aid Society’s Servant of Justice Award Dinner, June 22, 1992, at 2.
5 CDD Deputy Attorney-in-Charge Ivar Goldart, commenting on the above-mentioned National Center for
State Courts study, said that “[a]bsent pay parity and senior attorneys, these results would not have been
obtained. Some jurisdictions didn’t want to be studied [New York was not studied], and you can guess why.”
Coyle, Study Says Indigent Defense Can Be Effective, Nat’l LJ., June 22, 1992, at 9. According to an earlier
report, “Robert Baum, attorney-in-charge of the Criminal Defense Division, says low pay is the primary
reason lawyers cite for leaving Legal Aid, usually after four or five years, he says.” Impellizzeri, A Public
Defender Navigates the System, Manhattan Lmryer, Apr.1990.
6 The Union has always rejected this argument. See, e.g., Glaberson, Mayor Seeks City’s Options In Strike at
Legal Aid, N.Y.LJ., Nov. 10, 1982 (“The Union points out that the comparability table being used by the
Society only covers lawyers with five years experience or less.”).
7 Memorandum of Agreement 1 (Apr. 16, 1992, Apr. 22, 1991). Moreover, contrary to management claims, City
health and pension benefits for assistant district attorneys are not clearly inferior to those which apply to
Legal Aid Attorneys. For example, while Legal Aid pays a 65% contnbution into the staff attorney pension
plan, the City’s consolidated contnbution rate is almost 8%, Memorandum of May 14, 1992 from Program
Planners, Inc., and as a defined-benefit plan pays a much higher pension than that at Legal Aid. Unlike the
Society’s health plan, the City’s plan is applicable to retirees and their families. 1991 Health Benefits Summary
Program Description 41-42 (NYC Office of Labor Relations Employee Benefit Program, 1991). The features
of both of these plans therefore encourage senior staff retention.
Briefing Paper on Legal Aid Staff Attorney Salaries
Page4
Shortly after attorneys authorized strike action, management said that it was
reconsidering the comparability issue, but now appears to be advancing a new and lower
standard of comparison which continues to exclude more senior attorneys and seems intended
once again to justify a refusal to increase salaries. 8
Ironically, management’s rejection of comparability at all levels coincides with
unprecedented increases in the Society’s budget, which has grown from $101 million in FY1989
to $130 million in FY1992,9 while the number of staff attorneys has remained constant or even
slightly dipped.10 Moreover, at the Association’s persistent prodding, management has
unequivocally conceded for the first time that the Society is not limited to the City’s overall
wage policy, and that it can draw on its $80 million in City funds to pay better salaries.11
Nor has the Society’s refusal to bridge the comparability gap inhibited it from
simultaneously paying high salaries to supervisors, who unlike Staff Attorneys, have received
a 5% 1990 increase, and are soon to receive an additional1.5% retroactive to 1991:
8 Letter of July 13, 1992 from L. Robert Batterman to Michael Letwin.
9 Legal Aid Society Annual Reports, other management statistics.
10 Wise, Public Sector Salaries Bucking the Trend, N.Y.LJ., Mar. 24, 1992.
11 In 1988, management increased attorney salaries without advance permission from the City on the grounds
that such increases were necessary to maintain quality representation, and considered raising the money by
not hiring 40 additional attorneys when the City refused to pay for the entire raise. Giordano, Legal Aid’s
Union Deal Angers City,Manhattan Lawyer, Nov. 8, 1988. But in 1990~ 1991 contract bargaining, management
argued that the City would not allow Legal Aid to re-allocate its spending to increase attorney wages.
Memorandum of Feb. 21, 1991 from Archibald R. Murray to All Staff Attorneys (“Such a solution [the
Association’s proposal to transfer an additional!% of Society funds to staff attorney salaries] … directly
contravenes OMB [City Office of Management and Budget] guidelines which mandate an increase of no more
than 1.5% in new money for wages and benefits.”). This argument we:·s undercut when then-Deputy Mayor
for Public Safety Milton Mollen stated that the Society was not so restricted from such re-allocation.
Confirmation letter of Apr. 4, 1991 from Michael Letwin to Milton Mollen; Wise, City Seeks $4.8 Million
Cut From Legal Aid Budget, N. Y.LJ., Apr. 10, 1991. In response to the Association’s report at a bargaining
session on July 1, 1992 that the City has reaffirmed this position, management conceded that Society
re-allocation was not blocked by the City, but that the Society chose not to do re-allocate its City funds as a
matter of Legal Aid policy.
Briefing Paper on Legal Aid Staff Attorney Salaries
PageS
Comparison of Legal Aid Management and Government Official Salaries
LAS Staff Attorney Starting $29,000
LAS Staff AttomeyAverageu 40,000
LAS ManagementAverage13 74,000
NYC Police Chief 104,500
LAS Division Chief 106,000
NYS Appellate Division Judge 107,500
NYS Chief Judge 120,000
LAS Executive Director 123,000
NYC Mayor 123,000
Legal Aid Staff Attorneys don’t expect to earn the $85,000 average starting salary at
major private law firms in New York; we work at the Society to provide high quality legal
representation to poor people.
But in boosting staff demoralization and attrition, these unconscionably low salaries
undermine the Society’s stated mission and send the message that – no matter how serious
their case – indigent clients are not entitled to the most seasoned and skilled attorneys. As
the president of New York County Lawyers’ Association has explained in regard to judicial
salaries, “cut-rate salaries … will give us short-cut justice.”14
For these reasons, the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys has demanded retroactive
comparability with Manhattan assistant district attorneys salaries and called for 1993 and 1994
increases that match raises received by ADAs, or the regional cost of living, whichever is
greater.
So seriously do Legal Aid attorneys regard this issue that our members have authorized
an October 1st “No Contract, No Work” policy accompanied by limited strikers prior to
October, one of which will take place on July 15th during the Democratic Convention, for the
first time in conjunction with Local 1199 support staff and workers at the Criminal Justice
Agency.
At a time in which many accurately perceive that th~ law does not deal out equal justice,
quality indigent representation demands nothing less.
12 This figure was provided by management.
13 Average derived from management statistics on non-union professional staff.
14 Field, Cut-Rate Salaries and Cut-Rate Justice, N.Y.L.J., Feb.18, 1992.
I
Calculation of ALAA Wage Demand (April3, 1992) J
:~
Manhattan
# of Staff CUrrent ADA Dollar Percent Total $ Yr./Step Attorneys.:. LAS Salary Salary2 Difference Difference DisparitT
LG 97 29,000 32,000 3,000 10.3 291,000
l 27 3!.,500 33,000 1,500 4.8 40,500
2 119 33,424 34,000 576 1.7 68,544
3 14.1 37,450 38,000 550 1.5 77,550
4 143 41,6.12 42,500 sea· 2.1 126,984
5 158 45,.102 45,500 398 0.9 62,884
6 58 47,5.18 49,000 1,482 3.1 85,956
7 53 48,861 53,000 4,.139 8.5 219,367
8 23 50,067 58,500 8,433 16.8 193,959
9 18 51,411 62,500 11,089 21.6 199,602
10 15 52,572 65,500 12,928 24.6 193,920
ll. 5 54,229 69,500 15,271 28.2 76,355
12 4 55,571 73,500 17,929 32.3 71,716
13 2 60,900 74,500 13,600 22.3 27,200
14 3 60,900 75,500 14,609 24.0 43,800
15 11 60,900 79,000 lS,lOO 29.7 199,100
16 8 60,900 85,000 24,100 39.6 192,800
17+ ~ 60,900 91,500 30,600 50.2 ~~8361000
945 lO.l\4 4,007,2375
l.rhese numbers were provided by LAS manaqemant. Included is a brealcciown of Step 13 by years
of service, to allow for a direct comparison with the District Attorneys.
2All fiqures relata to non-supervisory ADA’s. !’or years 9-14, where the DA’s have a salary-.
ranqe, the lowest salary has bean selected.
3coverinq the o~e year period, October 1, 1991 – September 30, 1992.
‘This is the averaqe salny disparl ty per year/step.
5This fiqure represents the total dollar amount required to achieve comparability with the
District Atto1·neys.
APPENDIX A