ALAA Roots — An Unofficial Site

May 30, 1990

1990.05.30: Letwin Seech at ALAA JRD-OCA Rally

Filed under: ALAA History,Funding,Scabs — nyclaw01 @ 12:00 am

1990.05.30 Letwin speech at ALAA JRD-OCA Rally — OCR

MICHAEL LETWIN SPEECH, JRD/OCA RALLY 5/30/90

OCA DECISION MUST BE SEEN IN CONTEXT OF BROADER ISSUES CONFRONTING

US: ATTACK ON QUALITY REPRESENTATION FOR INDIGENT CLIENTS, ON

EQUAL PROTECTION AND ON THE UNIONS.

I. QUALITY OF REPRESENTATION: OCA’ S THREAT TO QUALITY

REPRESENTATION IS TO MAKE SURE THAT QUANTITY TAKES

PRECEDENCE OVER QUALITY.

THAT’S WHY IT IS SELLING OUR CHILDREN TO THE

LOWEST BIDDER AND WHY IT WANTS TO KILL JRD.

NO ACCIDENT THAT THE CHILDREN IT HAS CHOSEN TO

SELL IN NEW YORK CITY ARE OVERWHELMINGLY

AFRICAN-AMERICAN AND LATINO, THE SAME CHILDREN

WHO — BECAUSE OF THEIR POWERLESSNESS — ARE

BEING SOLD OUT BY THE WORST EDUCATION,

HOUSING, HEALTH CARE AND IN EVERY OTHER AREA.

BUT THE THREAT IS MUCH BROADER THAN THAT,

BECAUSE AS THE CRACK CRISIS ESCALATES,

GOVERNMENT HAS INCREASED THE PRESSURE ON ALL

DIVISIONS TO SPEEDUP I TO “PRODUCE, II TO

“COOPERATE.”

2

In’ ‘lJmr E Nffi BOOR ‘.EN ~ mruE

1S am< CRSS mMif5, ‘llE mmm mM

<mlmN:’ HS :ll’4mBD Qii AL rn.lS[N ‘1)

~, I][) ‘millE,” I][) ‘tlllElRIE.”

BUT ASSEMBLYLINE METHODS LEAD TO ASSEMBLYLINE

JUSTICE. AND IF WE SUCCUMB TO THE

ASSEMBLYLINE OUR CLIENTS WILL BE RIGHT TO

PERCEIVE US AS PART OF AN UNFAIR AND CORRUPT

SYSTEM.

ULTIMATELY, THE ONLY SOLUTION TO THE CRACK

CRISIS AND THE CASELOAD EXPLOSION IT HAS

PRODUCED IS TO PROVIDE JOBS, DRUG TREATEMENT

PROGRAMS ON DEMAND, EDUCATION, AND A DECENT

3

QUALITY OF LIFE AND DIGNITY FOR EVERYONE,

INSTEAD OF A FELONY RECORD AND A PRISON CELL.

IN THE MEANTIME, HOWEVER, LET IT BE KNOWN THAT

OUR UNIONS HAVE WILL CONTINUE TO FIGHT AGAINST

THE OCA’S OF THIS WORLD.

ALSO LET THERE BE NO CONFUSION ABOUT THE FACT

THAT OCA WANTS TO KILL JRD FOR PRECISELY THESE

REASONS.

II. GIVEN OCA’S LACK OF CONCERN FOR QUALITY REPRESENTATION,

AND ITS ABJECT UNION-BUSTING, THERE IS NOTHING SURPRISING

ABOUT THE FACT THAT IT IS IN DEFIANT VIOLATION OF LEGAL

REQUIREMENT THAT ALL CONTRACTING AGENCIES HAVE IN PLACE

AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR HIRING AND PROMOTION.

4

THIS RESISTANCE TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION HAS EARNED OCA A

HIGHLY CRITICAL REPORT BY THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION ON

MINORITIES — APPOINTED BY WACHTLER — WHICH FOUND THAT

“THE PAST AND PRESENT EMPLOYMENT PATTERNS OF THE COURT

SYSTEM SUGGEST RACIAL AND ETHNIC EXCLUSION” WHICH

CONTRIBUTES TO “THE PERCEPTION THAT THE NEW YORK STATE

COURT SYSTEM DISCRIMINATES ON THE BASIS OF RACE.”

III. LET NO ONE THINK, HOWEVER, THAT ANY OF OUR CRITICISM OF

OCA REFLECTS SATISFACTION WITH THE RECORD OF LEGAL AID

MANAGEMENT. ALL TOO OFTEN, LEGAL AID MANAGEMENT IS

HAPPY TO COMPLY WITH SACRIFICES OF QUALITY, TO TELL US

THAT THERE IS NO CHOICE: QUOTA IN CAB; ARRAIGNMENT

SPEEDUP IN CDD, CASELOADS IN BRONX CIVIL, OR IN OTHER

AREAS SUCH AS A REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THIRD TIME BAR

RETAKERS.

5

BUT OUR UNIONS HAVE ALWAYS FOUGHT MANAGEMENT TO SECURE

AN ADEQUATE QUALITY OF REPRESENTATION FOR OUR CLIENTS:

*STRUCK FOR AND WON

VERTICAL REPRESENTATION

AND CONTINUITY IN 1970S.

*FILED OFFICE-WIDE CASE LOAD

GRIEVANCES IN CDD AND DIVISION-WIDE

IN JRD: WON LIMIT ON LOAD, WHERE

NECESSARY WITHDRAWL FROM

ARRAIGNMENT/INTAKE.

2. WE HAVE ALWAYS STOOD FOR THE PRINCIPLE THAT AFFIRMATIVE

ACTION IS THE BUSINESS OF EVERY UNION AND EVERY UNION

MEMBER, FOR THE FAILURE TO HIRE, PROMOTE AND RESPECT

PEOPLE OF COLOR AT THE SOCIETY DEPRIVES US OF THE

ABILITIES OF MINORITY ATTORNEYS 1 PITTS UNION MEMBERS

… AGAINST EACH OTHER, AND REINFORCES THE WIDELY-HELD VIEW

6

THAT WE ARE SIMPLY PART AND PARCEL OF A JUDICIAL SYSTEM

THAT IS CHARACTERIZED BY RACIAL INJUSTICE.

LET MANAGEMENT BE ON NOTICE THAT ALL OF THESE AND OTHER ISSUES —

SUCH HEALTH & SAFETY, DECENT WAGES, A MEANINGFUL LAYOFFS CLAUSE

AND GAY AND LESBIAN RIGHTS — WILL BE A CENTRAL ISSUE IN THIS

YEAR’S CONTRACT BARGAINING.

III. MANAGEMENT HAS ALSO ENGAGED IN UNION-BUSTING, E.G., 1982

STRIKE AND SINCE THAT TIME.

WE MUST ALSO RECOGNIZE, HOWEVER, THAT FOR ALL THE

PROBLEMS AT LEGAL AID, WE HAVE WON VICTORIES IN QUALITY

OF REPRESENTATION, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, AND AGAINST UNION

BUSTING PRECISELY BECAUSE UNION MEMBERS HAVE FOUGHT TO

ACHIEVE THEM, THAT WITHOUT OUR UNIONS, WE WOULD BE

HELPLESS TO FIGHT FOR FURTHER JUSTICE IN THIS, OR ANY

7

STRUGGLE.

III. FINALLY, WHATEVER HAPPENS WITH THE OCA CONTRACT, WE

SHOULD REMEMBER THE IMPORTANT LESSONS WHICH THIS BATTLE –

– INCLUDING JRD 6 — HAS FOR BARGAINING. THAT

1. POWER (OCA/LAS) RESPONDS ONLY TO POWER.

2. UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL: ESPECIALLY

RE 1199/ALAA, BUT ALSO MORE BROADLY:

LSSA/LEGAL DIVISION, NCBL, CITY UNIONS: DC

37, IBT 237.

3. UNION IS ALL OF US.

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: